|
For Immediate
Release
4/9/08
Contact:
Donald Houser
(717) 787-1377
Affordability in Health Care is Key to Greater
Access
Editorial by Sen. Jake Corman
As the governor and Legislature begin negotiations on this year's state
budget, one of the key areas of debate will be health care.
Governor Rendell is proposing an expensive and far-reaching new program to
provide health care coverage to uninsured state residents. Before we implement a
new program with a price tag estimated between $1.4 billion and $3.2 billion, we
need to understand some basic facts: the billions of dollars taxpayers already
spend to provide health coverage, the actual numbers of the uninsured, and
details of the governor's plan.
Pennsylvania taxpayers already spend $6.3 billion a year to provide health
insurance to those who need medical assistance. If you qualify, you get the
services no matter what the cost. We cover everything from dental benefits,
eyeglasses, private nursing, prescription drugs, and residential treatment.
Pennsylvania pays $163.3 million for adultBasic - a health insurance program
for individuals who are between the ages of 19 and 65. And, we cover all kids.
CHIP, the children's health insurance program, which was established in 1992 and
has been expanded twice, is funded at over $100 million in state taxpayer and
federal funding.
In total, Pennsylvania serves over 2.1 million people through medical
assistance, adultBasic and CHIP, and we spend $6.3 billion doing it. If we
include the federal taxpayer dollars of $7.8 billion, that's $14.1 billion in
total.
According to the state Department of Insurance, 92 percent of Pennsylvanians
have health insurance coverage. That's right. When we talk about "the
uninsured," we're talking about 8 percent of Pennsylvania residents. I'm not
pointing this out in such a way as to make light of the uninsured's plight. It's
an effort to be honest about the numbers we're dealing with.
Nearly half of this 8 percent are relatively young -- between the ages of 18
and 34. Further, 38 percent of the uninsured have the ability to pick up
coverage from an employer, but don't. And nearly half of uninsured
Pennsylvanians - 44 percent - have been without insurance for less than a year.
The fact is, when you account for residents eligible for existing programs,
or have declined coverage offered by their employer, we're left with roughly 4
percent of Pennsylvanians uninsured or without access to private insurance.
Rather than create another new government program for this 4 percent,
shouldn't we be considering every alternative that will lower the cost of health
care so everyone who wants coverage can have access? I say yes. Instead of real
reform, the governor's plan simply preserves the status quo.
Currently, individuals in adultBasic pay a premium of $306 in addition to
minimal out-of-pocket expenses for hospitalization, physician care, emergency
services, diagnostic testing, maternity care and rehabilitation and skilled care
coverage. The governor's plan would include all of this and also cover
prescription and behavioral health services with a less expensive $286 premium.
In order to provide the expanded services at the reduced rate, the
administration plans to greatly reduce the amount they pay to insurance
companies for their services. While the previously uninsured individual will
benefit – who will pay for it? The rest of us – because insurance companies
will have to jack up the rates of private companies and the already insured to
cover the losses.
While employers may or may not be subject to a 3 percent fair share
assessment, they will be required to pay a portion of the premium for their
employees, in addition to a possible 3 percent tax, or "fair share assessment"
as the governor calls it.
A new version of the governor's proposal was recently passed by the House of
Representatives which, incredibly, includes no mechanism to pay for the
program. It actually contains the words, "any monies derived from whatever
sources" to pay for the program.
"Whatever?" How are taxpayers, who already spend more than $14 billion on
health care coverage, supposed to pay for this new plan passed by the House? So
far, the answer is, "whatever."
The Governor's "Cover All Pennsylvanians" now morphed into another acronym
ready slogan, "Access to Basic Care" program falls short when the answer is
"whatever."
I chair the Senate Majority Policy Committee, and on April 30th we will hold
a hearing to discuss the affordability of health care so we can offer the
majority of those uninsured, who are between the ages of 18 and 34, better
access to affordable coverage.
Some of the ideas that we will hear about and those I will advocate for are:
allowing individuals to purchase minimal insurance coverage without all of the
mandates that most insurance plans cover, allowing dependents to stay on their
parents policies for longer periods of time, tax incentives for health savings
accounts, and other cost savings measures. These reforms will reduce the cost
of health care and make health insurance affordable for people, reduce the
number of uninsured, and reduce the out of control, budget breaking annual
premium increases we all face year after year.
We have to get serious about this. We have to be serious about affordability,
cost reduction, and savings in our health care system before we back a plan
designed to grab national headlines that doesn't solve the uninsured problem,
but creates an insolvency problem and puts off paying for it until…whatever.
Additional Information:
Healthcare
Print this page
E-mail
this page

Back |